Article

Ocean and Polar Research. 2 June 2026. 1-24
https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2026013

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • 1. Introduction

  • 2. Material and Methods

  • 3. Result and Discussion

  • Trigonium cf. curvatum A.Nair, R.Mohan, S.Shetye, S.Gazi & S.A.Jafar 2015

  • Amphitetras antediluviana Ehrenberg 1840

  • Halamphora pseudoholsatica (T.Nagumo & H.Kobayasi) J.G.Štěpánek & Kociolek 2018

  • Halamphora sydowii (Cholnoky) Levkov 2009

  • Luticola sp.

  • Tryblionella coarctata f. densestriata Álvarez-Blanco & S.Blanco 2014

  • Entomoneis japonica (Cleve) K.Osada 2002

  • 4. Conclusion

1. Introduction

Submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is increasingly recognized as a significant hydrological process through whic h terrestrial groundwater enters the coastal ocean, bypassing surface runoff pathways. SGD is defined as the flow of groundwater through permeable sediments or rock fractures directly into the marine environment, delivering not only freshwater but also substantial amounts of nutrients, trace metals, and dissolved gases to coastal systems (Kim et al. 2012; Lecher and Mackey 2018). Although SGD is estimated to represent approximately 10% of the global river discharge volume, its biogeochemical influence on coastal ecosystems is disproportionately significant due to the elevated concentrations of solutes it frequently transports (Taniguchi et al. 2002; Moosdorf and Oehler 2017).

The volcanic island of Jeju, situated south of the Korean Peninsula, serves as an exemplary natural laboratory for the study of SGD. Characterized by its basaltic geology, high permeability, and the absence of major rivers, Jeju Island contains over 900 documented groundwater springs, approximately 145 of which are located along the coastline and identified as SGD discharge sites (Hahn et al. 1997; Lee et al. 2004). Historically, these coastal springs have served as essential freshwater sources for the island's inhabitants and function as transitional zones where terrestrial and marine biogeochemical processes converge (Hwang et al. 2010; Moosdorf and Oehler 2017).

A notable characteristic of SGD in Jeju is the presence of highly mineralized, saline groundwater, commonly termed Jeju lava seawater. This groundwater, originating from deep volcanic aquifers, is characterized by substantially elevated concentrations of dissolved silica—reported to be up to 20 times higher than those found in typical coastal seawater—alongside appropriate levels of nitrogen, phosphorus, iron, and trace elements (Kim and Kim 2011; An et al. 2024). The geochemical distinctiveness of Jeju lava seawater is attributed to prolonged interactions between water and basaltic substrates. These conditions may create highly favorable environments for siliceous microalgae, particularly diatoms, which require silica for the formation of their frustules (Martin-Jézéquel et al. 2000). Nevertheless, the physicochemical properties of SGD systems can vary considerably depending on temporal and hydrological factors, resulting in a broad spectrum of salinity regimes ranging from freshwater-dominated to saline groundwater conditions.

SGD environments are characterized by intrinsic dynamism, exhibiting spatiotemporal variability in salinity, temperature, redox conditions, and nutrient concentrations due to the mixing of fresh groundwater and seawater (Ahmadi Musaabad et al. 2019; Lecher and Mackey 2018). These environmental gradients promote niche heterogeneity and are increasingly recognized as hotspots of biological diversity and functional complexity. Moreover, the mixing of water columns driven by SGD can facilitate the resuspension of benthic microalgae into the photic zone, thereby enhancing planktonic-benthic coupling (Lecher and Mackey 2018). Such environments have been associated with the proliferation of opportunistic macroalgae, such as Ulva, and the occurrence of phytoplankton blooms under nutrient-enriched conditions (Liefer et al. 2009; Kwon et al. 2017). Additionally, these gradients are anticipated to influence benthic diatom assemblages, which are highly sensitive to variations in salinity, nutrient availability, and substrate characteristics.

Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) represent a crucial group of primary producers in aquatic ecosystems, contributing significantly to the global cycling of carbon and silica. The species composition of diatoms is highly sensitive to environmental conditions, making them reliable indicators of water quality and ecosystem health (Srivastava et al. 2016; Serôdio and Lavaud 2022). Although previous studies have characterized diatom assemblages in the river mouths and estuarine zones of Jeju (Lee et al. 2001; Jung et al. 2014; Kim et al. 2019), no study has specifically investigated diatom communities associated with SGD springs in Korea. In particular, the floristic composition of diatoms in these groundwater-influenced microhabitats remains largely unexplored.

Floristic surveys of diatoms conducted in diverse regions worldwide, especially within alpine and karstic spring ecosystems, have revealed a high degree of species richness and ecological specificity. These studies often identify taxa adapted to narrow physicochemical niches (Żelazna-Wieczorek and Ziułkiewicz 2009; Cantonati et al. 2012). This body of research highlights the potential of springs, including those affected by SGD, to support unique microbial communities that are frequently underrepresented in conventional assessments of aquatic biodiversity.

This study examines the diatom flora of Chunggulmul, a coastal SGD spring located on the northeastern shore of Jeju Island, with particular emphasis on species not previously recorded in South Korea. The primary objective is to present a floristic account of diatoms from the Chunggulmul SGD spring. Morphological characteristics are documented through light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations, and preliminary ecological context is provided for this groundwater-influenced coastal habitat.

2. Material and Methods

For the purposes of this study, samples were collected from the site designated as SGD (33º33'30.3''N, 126º45'4.3''E), referred to as Chunggulmul on Jeju Island, on July 5, 2021 (Fig. 1). Temperature and salinity were measured using a MP556 Multiprobe System (YSI, Yellow Springs, OH, USA) and recorded as 16.6°C and 2 PSU, respectively. The water samples were subsequently transferred into 50 mL conical tubes and preserved with 5% Lugol’s solution (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). A pretreatment procedure was implemented to investigate the fine structure and specific morphological characteristics of diatoms by removing organic matter from the samples. To eliminate organic material, samples were treated with nitric acid following the rapid cleaning method described by Trobajo and Mann (2019). A small aliquot of the sample was placed on a coverslip and air-dried, after which concentrated 70% nitric acid (HNO3) was added and heated on a hotplate at approximately 90°C. The acid was allowed to evaporate (approximately 10–15 min), and the treatment was repeated two to three times until no visible organic residue remained. The cleaned material was subsequently rinsed multiple times with distilled water to remove residual salts and air-dried prior to mounting. Finally, the cleaned samples were mounted in Naphrax (Brunel Microscopes, Chippenham, UK) and analyzed using an Eclipse Ni light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a ×100 oil immersion objective lens and a DS-RI2 digital camera (Nikon).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/opr/2026-048-00/N00804813/images/opr_48_01_13_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Study area and sampling site at Chunggulmul, Jeju Island. (a) Regional map showing the position of Jeju Island off the southern coast of the Korean Peninsula (red triangle). (b) Satellite image of Gimnyeong Village on the north-eastern shore of Jeju; the red box marks the oval, stone-lined coastal spring (Chunggulmul) investigated in this study. (c) Ground-level view of Chunggulmul. The satellite image included in this figure was sourced from Google Earth Map

For the examination conducted using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), the sample was initially fixed in a 5% Lugol's solution and subsequently filtered through a polycarbonate membrane with a pore size of 3 µm and a diameter of 25 mm (Advantec, Tokyo, Japan). The membrane was then rinsed with distilled water. Dehydration of the specimen was performed by sequential immersion in ethanol solutions of increasing concentration (10% to 100%), beginning at 10%. After dehydration through the ethanol series, the specimen was air-dried, and subsequently desiccated using tetramethylsilane (Sigma Aldrich). The membrane was mounted on a stub and coated with gold via sputter coating. SEM observations were conducted using a Sigma 500-VP field emission SEM (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) at an accelerating voltage of 2.0 kV and a working distance of approximately 5.4 mm, employing a secondary electron detector (SE2).

Diatom identification was conducted through consultation of various literature sources that provide comprehensive species descriptions of the species. Morphological observations focused on valve characteristics, including valve outline, raphe system, and striae pattern. Measurements, such as valve length, width, and striae density, were obtained from digital images; striae density was quantified by counting the number of striae within a 10 µm interval. For certain taxa, particularly rare or newly recorded species, only a limited number of individuals were available due to low abundance. Nevertheless, identification was based on consistent diagnostic morphological features observed in all available specimens using both LM and SEM, in accordance with standard taxonomic literature for each genus and species.

All images presented in this study were obtained from a total of three sources: two permanent slides prepared for LM and one SEM stub. All examined materials, including the permanent slides and SEM stubs, are archived in the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK) and are accessible for verification upon request. Additionally, the raw image data are also stored in an institutional repository.

The status of taxa as new records for Korea was determined by comparing the identified taxa with previously published Korean diatom records and the most recent national species checklists. These included the National Species List of Korea (NIBR 2025), provided by the National Institute of Biological Resources under the Ministry of Climate, Energy and Environment, and the National List of Marine Species (MABIK 2025), provided by the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea under the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. Additionally, a review of previously published Korean diatom literature was conducted to verify the absence of prior records.

3. Result and Discussion

As presented in Table 1, a total of 48 diatom taxa were identified from discharge samples collected at the Chunggulmul spring. These taxa are classified into 28 genera, 25 families, 19 orders, and 3 classes, following the taxonomic framework established by AlgaeBase (Guiry and Guiry 2025). Among these, five species—Amphitetras antediluviana, Entomoneis japonica, Halamphora pseudoholsatica, Halamphora sydowii, and Tryblionella coarctata f. densestriata—represent new records for Korea. In addition, two taxa, Trigonium cf. curvatum and Luticola sp., could not be confidently assigned to known species and are therefore excluded from the list of new records. The status of these taxa as novel records was verified through comparison with previously published Korean diatom literature and the most recent national species checklists. These taxa are indicated with an asterisk (*) in Table 1. This section details the floristic composition and taxonomic accounts of the observed diatom assemblage, highlighting primary morphological features that differentiate them from closely related species.

Table 1.

Diatom taxa recorded from the Chunggulmul submarine groundwater discharge site on Jeju Island. Taxonomic classification, figure numbers, habitats, and key references are provided. Asterisks denote species-level taxa newly recorded in Korea. 'Sal.' refers to salinity preference, with the following classifications: M = Marine, B = Brackish, F = Freshwater, and S = Soil. Additionally, 'Ecol.' denotes ecological type, which includes PL = Planktonic, BE = Benthic, EP = Epipelic, EI = Epiphytic, and TP = Tychoplanktonic

Classification Fig. no Habitat Key References
Sal. Ecol.
Class Coscinodiscophyceae Round & R.M.Crawford 1990
 Order Melosirales R.M.Crawford 1990
  Family Melosiraceae Kützing 1844
   Melosira inflexa (Roth) Guiry 2019 2–4, 73, 74 M/B TP Witkowski et al. (2000)
Hoppenrath et al. (2009); Joh (2010)
   Melosira nummuloides C.Agardh 1824 5, 6, 75 F/B TP, EP Witkowski et al. (2000)
Hoppenrath et al. (2009); Joh (2010)
 Order Paraliales R.M.Crawford 1990
  Family Paraliaceae Kützing 1844
   Paralia guyana MacGillivary 2015 7, 76 M/B TP MacGillivary and Kaczmarska (2015)
Yun et al. (2016)
  Order Arachnoidiscales Round 1990
  Family Arachnoidiscaceae Round 1990
   Arachnoidiscus ehrenbergii Bailey 1849 9, 10, 
77, 78
M EP, EI Shim (1994)
 Order Stephanopyxales Nikolaev
  Family Hydroseraceae Nikolaev & Harwood 2002
   Hydrosera whampoensis (A.F.Schwarz) Deby 1891 12, 82, 83 M BE Joh (2010)
 Order Stellarimales Nikolaev & Harwood
  Family Trigoniaceae Glezer 2019
   Trigonium cf. curvatum A.Nair, R.Mohan, S.Shetye, S.Gazi & S.A.Jafar 2015 11, 79–81 M BE Nair et al. (2015)
Class Mediophyceae Medlin & Kaczmarska 2004
 Order Thalassiosirales Glezer & I.V.Makarova 1986
  Family Thalassiosiraceae M.Lebour 1930
   Thalassiosira eccentrica (Ehrenberg) Cleve 1904 8 M PL Tomas (1997); Hoppenrath et al. (2009)
 Order Biddulphiales Willi Krieger 1954
  Family Biddulphiaceae Kützing 1844
   Biddulphia biddulphiana (J.E.Smith) Boyer 1900 13, 84 M/B TP Hoban (1983)
Galland and Pennebaker (2012)
 Order Eupodiscales V.A.Nikolaev & D.M.Harwood 2000
  Family Odontellaceae P.A.Sims, D.M.Williams & Ashworth 2018
   Amphitetras antediluviana Ehrenberg 1840* 14, 85, 86 M BE, EL, EI Mayama and Fujita (1995)
Sims et al. (2018)
   Odontella aurita (Lyngbye) C.Agardh 1824 15 M/B TP, EI Sims et al. (2018); An et al. (2023)
Class Bacillariophyceae Haeckel 1878
 Order Rhaphoneidales Round 1990
  Family Psammodiscaceae Round & D.G.Mann 1990
   Psammodiscus nitidus (Gregory) Round & Mann 1980 16 M/B TP, EI Garcia and Talgatti (2008)
Watanabe et al. (2013)
 Order Rhabdonematales Round & R.M.Crawford 1990
  Family Rhabdonemataceae Round & R.M.Crawford 1990
   Rhabdonema adriaticum Kützing 1844 17 M TP, EI Álvarez-Blanco and Blanco (2014);
Witkowski et al. (2000)
   Rhabdonema arcuatum (Lyngbye) Kützing 1844 18, 19 M TP, EI Witkowski et al. (2000)
  Family Grammatophoraceae Lobban & Ashworth 2014
   Grammatophora oceanica var. subtilissima (Bailey) Grunow 1881 20 M/B TP, EI Witkowski et al. (2000); Lee et al. (2012)
   Grammatophora oceanica Ehrenberg 1840 21, 87 M/B EI Álvarez-Blanco and Blanco (2014);
Witkowski et al. (2000)
   Grammatophora angulosa Ehrenberg 1840 22 M/B EI Witkowski et al. (2000); Sato et al. (2010)
   Grammatophora hamulifera Kützing 1844 23 M/B EI Witkowski et al. (2000)
 Order Cymbellales D.G.Mann 1990
  Family Rhoicospheniaceae J.Y.Chen & H.Z.Zhu 1983
  Rhoicosphenia abbreviata (C.Agardh) Lange-Bertalot 1980 24–26, 88–90 F/B EI Witkowski et al. (2000)
Kobayasi et al. (2006); Levkov et al. (2010)
Al-Handal and Al-Shaheen (2019)
 Order Licmophorales Round 1990
  Family Licmophoraceae Kützing 1844
   Podocystis spathulata (Shadbolt) Van Heurck 1896 27 M EI Lobban et al. (2012)
 Order Achnanthales P.C.Silva 1962
  Family Achnanthaceae Kützing 1844
   Achnanthes brevipes var. intermedia (Kützing) Cleve 1895 28–30, 91, 92 M/B EI Toyoda and Williams (2004)
Lee et al. (2013)
   Achnanthes subconstricta (F.Meister) K.Toyoda 2003 31, 93 F/B EI Toyoda et al. (2003); Lee et al. (2013)
  Family Achnanthidiaceae D.G.Mann 1990
   Planothidium hauckianum (Grunow) Bukhtiyarova 1999 32, 33, 94 M/B EI Joh (2012); Kulaš et al. (2020)
  Family Cocconeidaceae Kützing 1844
   Cocconeis pellucida Hantzsch 1863 34–36, 95, 96 M EI Witkowski et al. (2000); Joh (2021)
   Cocconeis scutellum Ehrenberg 1838 37, 97 M/B EI Álvarez-Blanco and Blanco (2014);
Witkowski et al. (2000)
Riaux-Gobin and Romero (2003);
Al-Handal and Al-Shaheen (2019)
Joh (2021)
   Cocconeis stauroneiformis H.Okuno 1957 38–40, 98, 99 M/B EI Witkowski et al. (2000)
Riaux-Gobin and Romero (2003)
   Cocconeis krammeri Lange-Bertalot & Metzeltin 41, 42 M/B EI Álvarez-Blanco and Blanco (2014);
Witkowski et al. (2000); Kim et al. (2017)
   Cocconeis placentula Ehrenberg 1838 43–45 F EI Al-Handal and Al-Shaheen (2019)
   Cocconeis pseudomarginata W.Smith 1853 46 M EI Witkowski et al. (2000)
 Order Naviculales Bessey 1907
  Family Amphipleuraceae Grunow 1862
   Halamphora subholsatica (Krammer) Levkov 2009 47 M/B EP Levkov (2009)
   Halamphora holsatica (Hustedt) Levkov 2009 48, 49 M/B EP Sar et al. (2003); Levkov (2009)
Stepanek and Kociolek (2018)
   Halamphora pseudoholsatica (Kobayasi & Nagumo) Levkov 2009* 50, 100 M/B EP Witkowski et al. (2000)
Stepanek and Kociolek (2018)
   Halamphora sydowii (Cholnoky) Levkov 2009* 101 M/B EP Levkov (2009)
Stepanek and Kociolek (2018)
   Amphiprora cf. pseudoduplex 59, 105–107 M/B EP Stachura-Suchoples et al. (2016);
Witkowski et al. (2000); Hein et al. (2008)
  Family Naviculaceae Kützing 1844
   Navicula flagellifera Hustedt 1939 51, 52 M/B EP Witkowski et al. (2000); Hein et al. (2008)
   Navicula perminuta Grunow 1880 53, 102 F/B EP Fukushima et al. (1992)
Kang et al. (1999)
Witkowski et al. (2000)
   Seminavis robusta D.B.Danielidis & D.G.Mann 2002 54 M/B EP Wachnicka and Gaiser (2007)
Hein et al. (2008)
Al-Handal and Al-Shaheen (2019)
   Trachyneis velata (A.W.F.Schmidt) Cleve 1894 55 M EP Witkowski et al. (2000)
Siqueiros Beltrones et al. (2016)
Lobban and Tharngan (2025)
  Family Diadesmidaceae D.G.Mann 1990
   Luticola sp. 56, 103 M/B EP
   Luticola mutica (Kützing) D.G.Mann 1990 57, 58, 104 F/S EP Álvarez-Blanco and Blanco (2014);
Al-Handal and Al-Shaheen (2019)
  Family Pleurosigmataceae Mereschowsky 1903
   Pleurosigma elongatum W.Smith 1852 60, 61 M/B EP Taylor et al. (2007)
Al-Handal and Al-Shaheen (2019)
 Order Bacillariales Hendey 1937
 Family Bacillariaceae Ehrenberg 1831
   Nitzschia incurva Grunow 1878 62 M/B TP, EP Al-Yamani and Saburova (2019)
Lobban and Witkowski (2023)
   Nitzschia gracilis Hantzsch 1860 63 F/B EP Siver et al. (2005); Kihara et al. (2009);
Hamsher et al. (2016)
   Nitzschia dissipata (Kützing) Grunow 1862 64, 65 F/B EP Watanabe (2005); Tuji (2016)
Al-Handal and Al-Shaheen (2019)
   Nitzschia inconspicua Grunow 1862 66, 67, 108 F/B EP Watanabe (2005); Trobajo et al. (2013);
Al-Handal and Al-Shaheen (2019)
   Tryblionella coarctata f. densestriata (Hustedt) A.M.M.Freitas & M.P.Lobo 2018* 68, 109 M/B EP Álvarez-Blanco and Blanco (2014)
 Order Surirellales D.G.Mann 1990
  Family Entomoneidaceae Reimer 1975
   Entomoneis japonica (Cleve) K.Osada 2002* 69, 110, 111 M/B EP Osada and Kobayasi (1985)
Kobayasi et al. (2006)
  Family Surirellaceae Kützing 1844
   Surirella taeniata Hustedt ex Simonsen 1987 70, 71 F/B EP Schmidt (1925); Park et al. (2017)
   Surirella recedens A.W.F.Schmidt 1875 72 F/B EP Park et al. (2012); Park et al. (2021)

Trigonium cf. curvatum A.Nair, R.Mohan, S.Shetye, S.Gazi & S.A.Jafar 2015

Key reference: Nair et al. (2015), Figs. 1-12.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/opr/2026-048-00/N00804813/images/opr_48_01_13_F2.jpg
Figs. 2–10.

Light micrographs of five diatom species. Figs. 2–4. Melosira inflexa. Figs. 5 and 6. M. nummuloides. Fig. 7. Paralia guyana. Fig. 8. Thalassiosira eccentrica. Figs. 9 and 10. Arachnoidiscus ehrenbergii. Scale bar is 10 µm

Description: Frustules robust, tripolar. Valves triangular, with distinctly concave sides and apices raised into prominent pseudocelli. Valve face ornamented with polygonal, projecting loculate areolae, 2–3 µm in diameter; each loculus bordered by 4–6 internal puncta. Areolae towards the apices progressively reduced, forming hyaline pseudocellular fields. Central valve region bearing a cluster of approximately 12 short, tubular rimoportulae. Valve mantle vertical, with areolate pattern continuous from the valve face (Figs. 11 and 79–81).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/opr/2026-048-00/N00804813/images/opr_48_01_13_F11.jpg
Figs. 11–16.

Light micrographs of six diatom species. Fig. 11. Trigonium cf. curvatum. Fig. 12. Hydrosera whampoensis. Fig. 13. Biddulphia biddulphiana. Fig. 14. Amphitetras antediluviana. Fig. 15. Odontella aurita. Fig. 16. Psammodiscus nitidus. Scale bar is 10 µm

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/opr/2026-048-00/N00804813/images/opr_48_01_13_F17.jpg
Figs. 17–33.

Light micrographs of eleven diatom species. Fig. 17. Rhabdonema adriaticum. Figs. 18 and 19. R. arcuatum. Fig. 20. Grammatophora oceanica var. subtilissima. Fig. 21. G. oceanica. Fig. 22. G. angulosa. Fig. 23. G. hamulifera. Figs. 24–26. Rhoicosphenia abbreviata. Fig. 27. Podocystis spathulata. Figs. 28–30. Achnanthes brevipes var. intermedia. Fig. 31. A. subconstricta. Figs. 32 and 33. Planothidium hauckianum. Scale bar is 10 µm

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/opr/2026-048-00/N00804813/images/opr_48_01_13_F34.jpg
Figs. 34–46.

Light micrographs of six diatom species. Figs. 34–36. Cocconeis pellucida. Fig. 37. C. scutellum. Figs. 38–40. C. stauroneiformis. Figs. 41 and 42. C. krammeri. Figs. 43–45. C. placentula. Fig. 46. C. pseudomarginata. Scale bar is 10 µm

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/opr/2026-048-00/N00804813/images/opr_48_01_13_F47.jpg
Figs. 47–68.

Light micrographs of sixteen diatom species. Fig. 47. Halamphora subholsatica. Figs. 48 and 49. H. holsatica. Fig. 50. H. pseudoholsatica. Figs. 51 and 52. Navicula flagellifera. Fig. 53. N. perminuta. Fig. 54. Seminavis robusta. Fig. 55. Trachyneis velata. Fig. 56. Luticola sp. Figs. 57 and 58. L. mutica. Fig. 59. Amphiprora pseudoduplex. Figs. 60 and 61. Pleurosigma elongatum. Fig. 62. Nitzschia incurva. Fig. 63. N. gracilis. Figs. 64 and 65. N. dissipata. Figs. 66 and 67. N. inconspicua. Fig. 68. Tryblionella coarctata f. densestriata. Scale bar is 10 µm

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/opr/2026-048-00/N00804813/images/opr_48_01_13_F69.jpg
Figs. 69–72.

Light micrographs of three diatom species. Fig. 69. Entomoneis japonica. Figs. 70 and 71. Surirella taeniata. Fig. 72. S. recedens. Scale bar is 10 µm.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/opr/2026-048-00/N00804813/images/opr_48_01_13_F73.jpg
Figs. 73–84.

Scanning electron micrographs of seven diatom species. Figs. 73 and 74. Melosira inflexa. Fig. 75. M. nummuloides. Fig. 76. Paralia guyana. Figs. 77 and 78. Arachnoidiscus ehrenbergii. Figs. 79–81. Trigonium cf. curvatum. Figs. 82 and 83. Hydrosera whampoensis. Fig. 84. Biddulphia biddulphiana. Scale bars: 20 µm (76–79, 82–84); 10 µm (73–75, 81); 5 µm (80)

Remarks: The present material is provisionally assigned to Trigonium cf. curvatum, originally described from Prydz Bay, Antarctica (Nair et al. 2015), and later revised to its current orthography in accordance with Articles 23.5 and 62.2 of the International Code of Nomenclature (ICN). The specimens examined in this study closely match the original description regarding valve outline, the structure of the loculate areolae, and the presence of a central cluster of rimoportulae. Nair et al. (2015) differentiated T. curvatum from T. arcticum partly based on the absence of central labiate processes in the latter species. However, subsequent research has revealed that T. arcticum can exhibit numerous labiate processes (e.g. 25–80 per valve) (Hoban 1983; Ferrario and Ferreyra 1984; Gibson and Mahoney 1984), suggesting that this characteristic is variable and thus unreliable for taxonomic differentiation. Moreover, taxonomic delimitation within biddulphioid diatoms, including the genus Trigonium, has historically been challenging, as closely related taxa are often confused or misidentified due to overlapping morphological traits (Gibson and Mahoney 1984). These findings highlight the limitations of relying on single or variable morphological characters for species-level identification within this group.

Despite the inherent complexities, the present material can be differentiated from T. arcticum based on a consistent set of morphological characteristics. Specifically, the valves exhibit distinctly concave sides, feature projecting loculate areolae measuring less than 5 µm in diameter with 4–6 internal puncta, and possess relatively narrow girdle bands. Conversely, T. arcticum is characterized by straight to convex valve margins, flattened areolae exceeding 5 µm in diameter with a greater number of puncta, and broader girdle bands. The specimens analyzed in this study correspond closely to this morphotype in all primary diagnostic traits.

Nevertheless, certain differences were observed, including a smaller valve size (apical axis approximately 99.8 µm compared to 175–360 µm in Antarctic populations) and a reduced number of labiate processes (approximately 12 versus 20–24). This variation may reflect size reduction during vegetative reproduction or regional morphological variability, both of which have been documented in biddulphioid diatoms.

T. curvatum is presently considered taxonomically unresolved in AlgaeBase. Despite the general morphological agreement observed, and recognizing the inherent complexity of this group, the specimens examined herein are provisionally assigned to Trigonium cf. curvatum. Definitive clarification of its taxonomic status necessitates comprehensive investigations, including detailed analyses of girdle ultrastructure and molecular markers such as 18S rRNA and rbcL genes.

Distribution and ecology: Nair et al. (2015) described Trigonium curvatum as a large epiphytic–benthic diatom predominantly found in marginal-marine environments, especially within sediments associated with sea ice in Antarctic regions. Although initially reported from polar habitats, species within the T. arcticum complex have since been identified across a wide range of geographic locations, encompassing temperate and tropical environments (Krayesky et al. 2009; Gupta and Das 2020). This evidence suggests that their distribution is not exclusively limited to cold or polar conditions.

From an ecological perspective, the presence of such taxa beyond their originally documented range should be approached with caution. The distribution of benthic and epiphytic diatoms is heavily influenced by local environmental factors, substrate properties, and biological interactions, often leading to assemblages that are highly dynamic and context-dependent (Hinode et al. 2021). Furthermore, species such as T. arcticum have been observed in a diverse array of marine habitats, including epiphytic environments (Tiffany and Lange 2002), indicating a broader ecological tolerance than previously recognized.

In the present study, the sampling site is affected by submarine groundwater discharge (SGD), resulting in physicochemical conditions that differ markedly from those of the adjacent coastal waters. The recorded temperature (16.6°C) and salinity (2 psu) reflect a pronounced freshwater influence, leading to the establishment of a relatively stable microhabitat. These localized conditions may promote the persistence of taxa commonly associated with cooler or marginal-marine environments. Nevertheless, additional ecological and physiological data are required to comprehensively assess this interpretation.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/opr/2026-048-00/N00804813/images/opr_48_01_13_F85.jpg
Figs. 85–96.

Scanning electron micrographs of seven diatom species. Figs. 85 and 86. Amphitetras antediluviana. Fig. 87. Grammatophora oceanica. Figs. 88–90. Rhoicosphenia abbreviata. Figs. 91 and 92. Achnanthes brevipes var. intermedia. Fig. 93. A. subconstricta. Fig. 94. Planothidium hauckianum. Figs. 95 and 96. Cocconeis pellucida. Scale bars: 20 μm (85); 10 μm (87–89, 91–93, 95); 5 μm (86, 90, 94, 96)

Amphitetras antediluviana Ehrenberg 1840

Key references: Mayama and Fujita (1995), Figs. 1-11; Sims et al. (2018), Figs. 95–100.

Synonyms: Triceratium antediluvianum (Ehrenberg) Grunow 1868; Biddulphia antediluviana (Ehrenberg) Van Heurck 1885; Odontella antediluviana (Ehrenberg) M.Peragallo 1903.

Description: Frustules cuboidal in girdle view. Valves square to slightly rhomboidal, with straight to slightly concave margins and broadly rounded to weakly produced angles; valve width (side length) 58.8 µm. Central annulus circular to oval, from which robust costae radiate towards the corners, occasionally bifurcating distally. Costae interconnected by vimines, forming large quadrangular areolae, 1.5–3 µm in diameter, spaced c. 4 µm apart. Valve face separated from mantle by a distinct marginal rim, terminating in a peripheral flange. Each corner bearing an ocellus composed of a silica ring enclosing densely packed porelli, externally ornamented with granules. Areolae internally occluded by two types of cribra: (i) a poroid mesh supported by delicate, bifurcating struts, and (ii) a cribrum formed by thick, spathulate plates producing T-shaped slits. Girdle bands numerous, open, each with a uniseriate row of rectangular areolae. Raphe absent.

Remarks: Amphitetras antediluviana was initially described as a fossil species by Ehrenberg (1840) and has subsequently been extensively characterized through both light and scanning electron microscopy (Mayama and Fujita 1995; Jahn and Kusber 2006; Sims et al. 2018; Nevrova et al. 2024). The specimens examined in the present study correspond closely with these previous descriptions in terms of overall valve morphology, ocellus structure, and internal areolar architecture.

This species can be differentiated from morphologically similar biddulphioid diatoms, including those of the genus Biddulphia, by a consistent set of diagnostic characteristics. Valves of A. antediluviana are typically quadrate, featuring four well-developed ocelli at the corners and a central annulus from which costae radiate, creating a regular quadrangular areolation pattern (Jahn and Kusber 2006; Sims et al. 2018). In contrast, species within the genus Biddulphia generally display more rounded valve outlines, lack distinct ocelli, and exhibit differences in the arrangement of costae and girdle structures (Sims et al. 2018). Additional distinguishing characteristics include the internal occlusion of areolae by cribra and the absence of a raphe system, both of which align with previous descriptions (Mayama and Fujita 1995; Sims et al. 2018). These combined features offer a reliable basis for differentiating A. antediluviana from superficially similar taxa.

Distribution and ecology: Amphitetras antediluviana was initially described by Ehrenberg (1840) as a marine species and is presently recognized as an extant taxon exhibiting a broad, nearly cosmopolitan distribution. This species has been documented in diverse coastal and marine environments throughout Europe, North and South America, Africa, Asia, and Australasia, reported under its accepted name as well as various synonyms, including Triceratium antediluvianum and Biddulphia antediluviana.

In Asia, A. antediluviana has been recorded in the Northwest Pacific region, encompassing Chinese coastal waters such as the Bohai Sea and adjacent northern coastal areas (Liu 2008), the Sea of Japan along the Russian Far Eastern coast, including the Peter the Great Bay region (Gail 1950), and Japanese coastal environments such as Arikawa Bay in Nagasaki Prefecture (Hinode et al. 2021). These observations suggest that the species is well established in the temperate marginal seas of East Asia.

The current documentation from Korean coastal waters expands the recognized distribution of A. antediluviana within East Asia. The SGD environment at Chunggulmul, characterized by the interaction between groundwater and seawater, likely offers favorable microhabitats for marine and euryhaline diatom taxa, including this species.

Halamphora pseudoholsatica (T.Nagumo & H.Kobayasi) J.G.Štěpánek & Kociolek 2018

Key references: Witkowski et al. (2000), p. 148, pl. 161, Figs. 5 and 6; Stepanek and Kociolek (2018), p. 33–34, pl. 31, Figs. 1-4.

Basionym: Amphora pseudoholsatica T.Nagumo & H.Kobayasi

Description: Valves strongly dorsiventral, semi-elliptical to semi-lanceolate, 15.7–24.8 µm long, 3.7–6.9 µm wide. Dorsal margin smoothly arched; ventral margin straight to slightly convex; apices narrowly sub-capitate, deflected ventrally. Junction between valve face and dorsal mantle marked by a distinct marginal silica ridge; dorsal mantle perpendicular. Mantle areolae arranged differently from those on the valve face. Dorsal striae coarse, distinctly punctate, uniseriate, 12 in 10 µm; several central dorsal striae shortened or fused, forming a small siliceous nodule. Ventral striae very fine, uniseriate, 17 in 10 µm. Internally, marginal ridge absent; dorsal virgae coalescing into a small hyaline fascia beneath the central nodule (Figs. 50 and 100).

Remarks: Published populations of Halamphora pseudoholsatica generally exhibit valve lengths ranging from 23 to 53 µm and breadths between 4.5 and 8 µm (Witkowski et al. 2000; Stepanek and Kociolek 2018). However, smaller valves measuring 18–21 µm in length and 3.3–4.5 µm in breadth have been documented in the Black Sea (Zidarova et al. 2022). The specimens examined in the present study (15.7–24.8 µm × 3.7–6.9 µm) extend the known lower size range of the species and likely correspond to late-series valves formed during size diminution.

The specimens can be reliably identified by a consistent set of diagnostic characteristics, which include a well-developed dorsal marginal ridge, coarse punctate uniseriate dorsal striae, and extremely fine ventral striae. These features are stable and have been highlighted in previous electron microscopy studies as essential criteria for the identification of H. pseudoholsatica (Witkowski et al. 2000; Stepanek and Kociolek 2018).

Halamphora pseudoholsatica has historically been misidentified with several related taxa. It can be distinguished from H. holsatica by its narrower valve width (typically less than 7 µm), the presence of a distinct dorsal marginal ridge, and finer ventral striae. In contrast, H. holsatica lacks the dorsal ridge and exhibits coarser ventral striae, measuring 16–18 in 10 µm (Sar et al. 2003). H. holsaticoides is characterized by a thin silica strip adjacent to the dorsal raphe and a more perpendicular mantle. Meanwhile, H. subholsatica lacks the dorsal ridge and displays ventral striae that are interrupted at the mid-valve; some authors consider this taxon conspecific with H. acutiuscula, which is distinguished by a more convex dorsal margin and more radiate dorsal striae (Sar et al. 2003).

Distribution and ecology: Halamphora pseudoholsatica was initially described from intertidal mudflats in Tokyo Bay and is currently recognized in temperate to subtropical coastal regions, including the Baltic Sea, North Sea, North Atlantic estuaries, and the Black Sea. This species has been characterized as a marine to brackish benthic diatom inhabiting coastal environments (Witkowski et al. 2000), exhibiting a broad salinity tolerance ranging from approximately 10 to 35 psu (Stepanek and Kociolek 2018).

The species is typically observed as an epipelic or epipsammic taxon on muddy or sandy substrates and has also been documented as epiphytic on macroalgae. This study constitutes the first recorded occurrence of H. pseudoholsatica in Korea.

Halamphora sydowii (Cholnoky) Levkov 2009

Key references: Levkov (2009), p. 232–234, pl. 105, Figs. 7–10, pl. 242, Figs. 1–4>; Stepanek and Kociolek (2018), p. 77, pl. 71, Figs. 5–8, pl. 74, Figs. 1–6.

Basionym: Amphora sydowii Cholnoky

Description: Valves semi-lanceolate, distinctly dorsiventral, 28 µm long, 4.7 µm wide. Dorsal margin strongly convex; ventral margin straight to slightly concave; apices short-protracted, rostrate to sub-capitate, deflected ventrally. Raphe positioned on a narrow, slightly elevated dorsal ledge. Proximal raphe ends closely appressed, expanded into small central pores, bent dorsally before slightly diverging; distal ends curved dorsally into the apices. Dorsal striae radiate, 17 in 10 µm, biseriate near the raphe ledge, becoming uniseriate towards the dorsal margin. Ventral striae very fine, uniseriate, 26 in 10 µm, each composed of a single elongate areola (Fig. 101).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/opr/2026-048-00/N00804813/images/opr_48_01_13_F97.jpg
Figs. 97–111.

Scanning electron micrographs of eleven diatom species. Fig. 97. Cocconeis scutellum. Figs. 98 and 99. C. stauroneiformis. Fig. 100. Halamphora pseudoholsatica. Fig. 101. H. sydowii. Fig. 102. Navicula perminuta. Fig. 103. Luticola sp. Fig. 104. L. mutica. Figs. 105–107. Amphiprora pseudoduplex. Fig. 108. Nitzschia inconspicua. Fig. 109. Tryblionella coarctata f. densestriata. Figs. 110 and 111. Entomoneis japonica. Scale bars: 20 µm (110); 10 µm (99–101, 105, 106, 111); 5 µm (97, 98, 102–104, 107–109)

Remarks: Halamphora sydowii is most likely to be confused with other small, strongly dorsiventral species; however, it can be distinguished by a consistent combination of valve breadth, stria structure, and raphe morphology.

This species differs from H. coffeaeformis in possessing dorsal striae that become uniseriate toward the margin and ventral striae composed of a single elongate areola, whereas H. coffeaeformis maintains biseriate dorsal striae and ventral striae consisting of 2–4 poroids (Levkov 2009). Additionally, Halamphora hybrida is narrower (3–4 µm in width), displays uniformly uniseriate dorsal striae, and has nearly straight proximal raphe ends, in contrast to H. sydowii, which is broader and exhibits proximal fissures distinctly deflected toward the dorsal side (Levkov 2009). Halamphora holsatica exhibits biseriate dorsal ornamentation and frequently biseriate striae, features that are absent in H. sydowii (Stepanek and Kociolek 2018). In contrast, Halamphora witkowskii is characterized by coarser dorsal striae (12–15 in 10 µm), consistently biseriate striae, denser ventral striae that may be partially biseriate, and a broader valve width ranging from 6 to 8 µm (Van de Vijver et al. 2014). Halamphora acutiuscula is narrower, measuring 3–4 µm, possesses long-capitate apices, nearly straight proximal raphe ends, and lacks the longitudinal rib found in H. sydowii (Yılmaz et al. 2025). Lastly, Halamphora veneta is distinguished by a more pronounced concave ventral margin, markedly down-curved apices, and finer dorsal striae (18–24 in 10 µm) (Levkov 2009).

The specimen analyzed in this study corresponds closely to the diagnostic characteristics of H. sydowii; however, the identification is based on a single valve.

Distribution and ecology: Halamphora sydowii has been documented in a diverse array of freshwater to brackish environments throughout Europe and Asia, encompassing alkaline rivers, canals, reservoirs, and spring systems (Levkov 2009; Van de Vijver et al. 2014). This species demonstrates a wide ecological tolerance and has been observed in conditions ranging from oligohaline to mesohaline (Yılmaz et al. 2025). The species has been documented in a variety of hydrological environments, including mineral-rich thermal waters, spring-fed streams, and mildly brackish coastal springs, demonstrating significant ecological adaptability to low-salinity conditions. This study constitutes the first recorded occurrence of H. sydowii in Korea.

Luticola sp.

Description: Valve rectangular in girdle view. Valves linear- to elliptic-lanceolate with broadly rounded, non-protracted apices, 21 µm long, 7.1 µm wide. Axial area narrow, straight, slightly widening towards a panduriform central area, bordered on each side by one to two enlarged areolae. Striae radiate throughout, 22 in 10 µm; each stria composed of three to four round to slightly elongate areolae, continuing onto the mantle as a single row with corresponding number of pores. A slit-like stigma present submarginally on the secondary side, accompanied externally by a minute occluded marginal pore. On the primary side, two to three shallow pit-like depressions present midway between the sternum and valve margin. Raphe filiform; proximal raphe ends attenuated, weakly deflected towards the primary side and then slightly recurved towards the stigma, lying nearly parallel to the apical axis. Distal raphe fissures hooked towards the stigma, terminating on the valve face (Figs. 56 and 103).

Remarks: The current taxon can be assigned to the genus Luticola due to the presence of a single isolated stigma, radiate striae composed of distinct areolae, and a raphe system exhibiting differentiated proximal and distal endings, which align with the contemporary circumscription of the genus (Da Silva-Lehmkuhl et al. 2019; Lokhande et al. 2021).

Morphologically, the specimens exhibit overall similarity to Luticola hunanensis, particularly in valve outline characterized by broadly rounded, non-protracted apices, the presence of a slit-like stigma associated with a marginal pore, and the general configuration of the central area. However, a notable discrepancy is evident in the morphology of the proximal raphe endings. According to the protologue of L. hunanensis, the proximal raphe fissures are distinctly hook-shaped, displaying an approximately right-angled deflection toward the stigma-bearing side (Liu et al. 2017). In contrast, the specimens under study possess proximal endings that are attenuated and follow a gently S-shaped course. Given that proximal raphe morphology is considered a critical diagnostic character within Luticola, this difference precludes a definitive assignment to that species.

In addition to L. hunanensis, the specimens exhibit general morphological characteristics consistent with several small Luticola species, including L. mutica, L. frequentissima, and L. goeppertiana. The present material differs from L. mutica by possessing a distinctly panduriform central area bordered by enlarged areolae and a higher stria density (22 in 10 µm). L. frequentissima differs in the configuration of the central area and the morphology of the distal raphe endings, which are typically more extended and oriented differently (Noga et al. 2017). In contrast, the distal fissures in the present material hook toward the stigma and terminate on the valve face. Although L. goeppertiana exhibits a comparable general outline, it differs in central area development and proximal raphe morphology (Pavlov et al. 2009). Additional distinctions are apparent when compared with L. beyensii, particularly regarding central area structure and raphe configuration (Van de Vijver et al. 2002).

Despite these comparisons, the observed combination of characteristics—including a panduriform central area, relatively high stria density, a slit-like stigma accompanied by a marginal pore, and attenuated proximal raphe endings—does not correspond exactly to any previously described species. This challenge aligns with recent research indicating that the genus Luticola is morphologically complex and taxonomically challenging, exhibiting high species diversity and frequently overlapping diagnostic features, especially in freshwater to low-salinity habitats (Da Silva-Lehmkuhl et al. 2019; Bagmet et al. 2023).

From an ecological standpoint, the presence of this taxon within a coastal SGD system necessitates careful interpretation. Luticolahunanensis was initially described from freshwater environments (Liu et al. 2017); however, the current specimens were obtained under conditions of strong freshwater influence (approximately 2 psu), suggesting that the site represents a localized low-salinity microhabitat. Previous research has demonstrated that Luticola species inhabit a broad spectrum of salinity regimes, including marine and brackish waters, indicating a wider ecological tolerance than previously recognized (Rybak et al. 2021). Furthermore, the genus has been documented across diverse hydrological contexts and biogeographic regions, reflecting substantial ecological plasticity and dispersal capacity (Lokhande et al. 2021).

In this context, the observed population may represent (i) a resident population adapted to low-salinity conditions within the SGD system, (ii) allochthonous input originating from groundwater or inland freshwater sources, or (iii) a distinct yet morphologically similar taxon inhabiting transitional habitats.

Due to the discrepancy observed in a critical diagnostic character and the limited availability of specimens, the material is provisionally classified as Luticola sp. Comprehensive further studies, encompassing the collection of additional specimens, detailed scanning electron microscopy analyses of multiple valves, and molecular data acquisition, are required to clarify its taxonomic status.

Tryblionella coarctata f. densestriata Álvarez-Blanco & S.Blanco 2014

Reference: Álvarez-Blanco and Blanco (2014), pl. 40: Figs. 7–10, pl. 87: Fig. 3

Description: Valves linear-panduriform, distinctly constricted at mid-length and widening towards broadly cuneate, short-rostrate apices; a longitudinal fold present along the valve face. Valve 20.1 µm long, 7.7 µm wide. Raphe keel strongly eccentric, with a distinct central nodule. Fibulae 15 in 10 µm. Striae punctate, 23 in 10 µm, arranged in transverse rows and interrupted by the longitudinal fold. Areolae coarse, arranged in distinct tiers; puncta appearing enlarged where crossing the fold (Figs. 68 and 109).

Remarks: Tryblionella coarctata f. densestriata exhibits the panduriform valve outline, a strongly eccentric raphe keel, and a prominent longitudinal fold, consistent with the nominate taxon. However, it is distinguished by its smaller valve dimensions (10–23 µm × 5–7 µm compared to 25–140 µm × 11–22 µm) and a higher density of transapical striae (22–30 per 10 µm versus ≤ 18). Additionally, the fibulae number ranges from 13 to 16 per 10 µm.

Among related taxa, Psammodictyon panduriforme var. continuum also exhibits panduriform valves and punctate striae; however, it is distinguished by the presence of a hyaline half-valve, coarser striation, and a less pronounced longitudinal fold (Round et al. 1990). In contrast, Nitzschia panduriformis and N. constricta display a similar valve outline but possess a central (rather than strongly eccentric) raphe keel and lack the distinct longitudinal fold that interrupts the striae (Snoeijs and Balashova 1998).

Distribution and ecology: Tryblionella coarctata f. densestriata was initially described as a free-living epilithic species inhabiting coastal rocks near El Mojón, Murcia, Spain (Álvarez-Blanco and Blanco 2014). Subsequently, it has also been documented on stones in the brackish waters of Ereğli Bay along the Turkish Black Sea coast (Dirican et al. 2022). The specimens obtained from the oligohaline coastal spring Chunggulmul on Jeju Island constitute the first recorded occurrence of this taxon in Korea and the broader northwestern Pacific region. In addition to its free-living occurrences, this taxon has been documented as an intracellular symbiont of the foraminifer Pararotalia calcariformata along the Israeli coast (Schmidt et al. 2018). These observations suggest that the species inhabits a variety of coastal and brackish environments and may occupy both benthic substrates and symbiotic niches.

Entomoneis japonica (Cleve) K.Osada 2002

Key references: Osada and Kobayasi (1985), p. 215–224, pl. 1–5: Figs. 1–30; Kobayasi et al. (2006), p. 144, pl. 179, Figs. 1–8.

Basionym: Amphiprora alata var. japonica Cleve 1894.

Synonym: Entomoneis alata var. japonica (Cleve) Osada & Kobayasi 1985.

Description: Frustules panduriform, slightly twisted along the apical axis; in girdle view violin-shaped and distinctly constricted at mid-length. Valves linear-lanceolate with acutely pointed apices, 103.4 µm long. Striae parallel, biseriate, 11 in 10 µm. Each stria composed of two rows of poroid areolae, externally occluded by dome-shaped hymenes perforated by scattered elongate pores. Raphe canal forming a strongly S-shaped, wing-like keel elevated above the valve surface. The junction between the keel and valve body defined by a row of basal fibulae, appearing distinctly bisinuous on either side of the central nodule. Cingulum composed of five girdle bands; areolae occluded by hymenes with circular pores centrally and elongate pores towards the margins (Figs. 69, 110 and 111).

Remarks: This species is distinguished from related taxa by a combination of morphological features, including a violin-shaped valve outline, a consistently bisinuous junction line, and relatively coarse, biseriate striae (11–12 in 10 µm). These characters differentiate it from E. paludosa, which has finer, uniseriate striae (21–26 in 10 µm), and from E. punctulata and E. aequabilis, which exhibit much higher stria densities (≥ 32 in 10 µm) (Mejdandžić et al. 2017).

In addition, the scattered arrangement of hymen pores on the valve face contrasts with the centrally aligned pattern observed in E. alata (Kobayasi et al. 2006). Observations from clonal cultures indicate that valve length may be reduced to approximately 55 µm without affecting stria density, keel morphology, or junction-line structure, supporting the stability of these diagnostic characters (Osada and Kobayasi 1985).

Distribution and ecology: The species is common in brackish-water habitats across Japan (Kobayasi et al. 2006). Field collections from tidal-flat muds and estuarine sediments indicate a benthic, attached life form. Clonal cultures demonstrate growth at salinities of 15–25 psu, indicating an affinity for moderate brackish conditions (Osada and Kobayasi 1985). Accordingly, Entomoneis japonica is regarded as a euryhaline, epipelic to epilithic species typical of estuarine environments. This study represents the first record of this species in Korea.

4. Conclusion

This study documents the diatom flora of the Chunggulmul submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) spring on Jeju Island and provides the first floristic account of diatoms from this unique habitat in Korea. A total of 48 taxa belonging to 28 genera were identified based on LM and SEM observations. Among them, five species are reported for the first time in Korea, while two taxa (Trigonium cf. curvatum and Luticola sp.) remain unresolved at the species level. The assemblage included taxa with freshwater, brackish, and marine affinities, reflecting the variable environmental conditions associated with groundwater–seawater mixing in the spring. Because studies on diatom communities from SGD environments in Korea remain limited, the present work provides baseline floristic information for this habitat. Further investigations across multiple seasons and sites would help to better understand the ecological dynamics and biodiversity of diatoms in groundwater-influenced coastal systems.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Development of Useful Materials Derived from Marine Microorganisms and Microalgae (2026M00600) funded by the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK).

References

1

Ahmadi Musaabad L, Panahy Panahy Mirzahasanlou J, Mahmoodlu MG, Bahlakeh A (2019) Diatom flora in three springs of Golestan Province. J Phycol Res 3(2):432–442

2

Al-Handal AY, Al-Shaheen MA (2019) Diatoms in the wetlands of Southern Iraq. J. Cramer/Gebrüder Borntraeger Science Publishers, Stuttgart, 252 p

3

Álvarez-Blanco I, Blanco S (2014) Benthic diatoms from Mediterranean coasts. J. Cramer/Gebrüder Borntraeger Science Publishers, Stuttgart, 409 p

4

Al-Yamani FY, Saburova MA (2019) Marine phytoplankton of Kuwait’s waters. Volume II Diatoms, Cyanobacteria, Dinoflagellates, Flagellates. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait, 350 p

5

An SM, Cho K, Kang NS, Kim ES, Ki H, Choi G, An HS, Go GM (2024) Development of a cost-effective medium suitable for the growth and fucoxanthin production of the microalgae Odontella aurita using Jeju lava seawater and agricultural fertilizers. Biomass Bioenergy 188:107310. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107310

10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107310
6

An SM, Cho K, Kim ES, Ki H, Choi G, Kang NS (2023) Description and characterization of the Odontella aurita OAOSH22, a marine diatom rich in eicosapentaenoic acid and fucoxanthin, isolated from Osan Harbor, Korea. Mar Drugs 21(11):563. doi:10.3390/md21110563

10.3390/md2111056337999387PMC10671887
7

Bagmet VB, Abdullin SR, Nikulin AY, Nikulin VY, Gontcharov AA (2023) Luticola tenera sp. nov. (Diadesmidaceae, Naviculales) - A new diatom from the soil of the state nature reserve “Bastak” (Jewish Autonomous Region, Russia). Life 13(9):1937. doi:10.3390/life13091937

10.3390/life1309193737763341PMC10533167
8

Cantonati M, Angeli N, Bertuzzi E, Spitale D, Lange-Bertalot H (2012) Diatoms in springs of the Alps: spring types, environmental determinants, and substratum. Freshw Sci 31(2):499–524

10.1899/11-065.1
9

Da Silva-Lehmkuhl AM, Ludwig TAV, Tremarin PI, Bicudo DDC (2019) On Luticola Mann (Bacillariophyceae) in southeastern Brazil: taxonomy, ecology and description of two new species. Phytotaxa 402(4):165–186

10.11646/phytotaxa.402.4.1
10

Dirican S, Kaleli A, Yilmaz E, Özer A, Dayioğlu H (2022) New records of diatoms (Bacillariales, Rhopalodiales & Surirellales) with ultrastructure details from the Black Sea coast of Turkey. Aquat Sci Eng 37(1):19–28

10.26650/ASE2021983449
11

Ehrenberg CG (1840) Über noch zahlreich jetzt lebende Thierarten der Kreidebildung und den Organismus der Polythalamien. Abhandlung der Könglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Berlin, 94 p

12

Ferrario ME, Ferreyra GA (1984) A reappraisal of Trigonium arcticum (Brightwell) Cleve and T. formosum (Brightwell) Cleve, from Bahia Paraiso Antarctica, using both optical and scanning electron microscopy techniques. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Diatom Symposium, Paris, 27 August–1 September 1984

13

Fukushima H, Kobayashi T, Fujita H, Yoshitake S (1992) Morphological variability of Navicula perminuta Grunow. Jpn J Water Treat Biol 28(2):5–13

10.2521/jswtb.28.2_5
14

Gail GI (1950) Manual for identification of the phytoplankton of the Sea of Japan. Trans Pacific Res Inst Fish Oceanogr 33(1):1–177

15

Galland GR, Pennebaker SL (2012) A benthic diatom bloom in the Gulf of California, Mexico. BioInvasions Rec 1(1):65–69

10.3391/bir.2012.1.1.14
16

Garcia M, Talgatti DM (2008) Morphology and distribution of Psammodiscus nitidus (Gregory) Round & Mann from Santa Catarina coast, Brazil. In: Aplicações da ficologia: anais do XI Congresso Brasileiro de Ficologia e Simpósio Latino-Americano sobre Algas Nocivas: organização da Sociedade Brasileira de Ficologia, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí, 25–1 Mar–Apr 2006

17

Gibson RA, Mahoney RK (1984) Comparative valve and cingular structure in Biddulphia titiana (Grunow) Grunow in Van Heurck and Trigonium arcticum (Brightwell) Cleve (Bacillariophyceae). Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia 136:200–217

18

Guiry MD, Guiry GM (2025) AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication. National University of Ireland, Galway. https://www.algaebase.org Accessed 10 Jun 2025

19

Gupta RK, Das SK (2020) Algae of India volume 4. A checklist of Indian diatoms. Botanical Survey of India Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change Government of India, Kolkata, 327 p

20

Hahn J, Lee Y, Kim N, Hahn C, Lee S (1997) The groundwater resources and sustainable yield of Cheju volcanic island, Korea. Environ Geol 33(1):43–53

10.1007/s002540050223
21

Hamsher S, Kopalova K, Kociolek JP, Zidarova R, Van De Vijver B (2016) The genus Nitzschia on the South Shetland Islands and James Ross Island. Fottea 16(1):79–102

10.5507/fot.2015.023
22

Hein MK, Winsborough BM, Sullivan MJ (2008) Bacillariophyta (diatoms) of the Bahamas. Iconographia Diatomologica 19. Gantner Verlag, Ruggell, Germany, 303 p

23

Hinode K, Kamisaki H, Nishihara GN, Terada R (2021) The phenology of epiphytic diatoms and epifauna observed on Zostera marina of Arikawa Bay, Nagasaki Prefecture, Japan. Plankton Benthos Res 16(3):179–190

10.3800/pbr.16.179
24

Hoban MA (1983) Biddulphioid diatoms. II: the morphology and systematics of the pseudocellate species, Biddulphia biddulphiana (Smith) Boyer, B. alternans (Bailey) Van Heurck, and Trigonium arcticum (Brightwell) Cleve. Bot Mar 26:271–284

10.1515/botm.1983.26.6.271
25

Hoppenrath M, Elbrächter M, Drebes G (2009) Marine phytoplankton. Schweizerbart Science Publishers, Stuttgart, 264 p

26

Hwang DW, Kim GB, Lee JY (2010) Submarine discharge of fresh groundwater through the coastal area of Korea Peninsula: importance as a future water resource. The Sea 15(4):192–202

10.7850/JKSO.2010.15.4.192
27

Jahn R, Kusber WH (2006) Algae of the Ehrenberg collection: 3. Typification of seven diatom taxa described by CG Ehrenberg predominantly from Greece. Willdenowia 36:527–535

10.3372/wi.36.36150
28

Joh G (2010) Algal flora of Korea. Volume 3, Number 1. Chrysophyta: Bacillariophyceae: Centrales. Freshwater diatoms I. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, 161 p

29

Joh G (2012) Algal flora of Korea. Volume 3, Number 7. Chrysophyta: Bacillariophyceae: Pennales: Raphidineae: Acananthaceae. Freshwater diatoms V. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, 134 p

30

Joh G (2021) Distribution of the genus Cocconeis (Bacillariophyceae) along the Seogwipo coast of Jeju Island, South Korea. Phytotaxa 528(3):149–179

10.11646/phytotaxa.528.3.1
31

Jung MH, Cho HJ, Yun JH, Lee HY (2014) Epilithic diatom communities in streams of Jeju island. Korean J Environ Biol 32(1):16–25

10.11626/KJEB.2014.32.1.016
32

Kang JS, Kang SH, Lee JH (1999) Cryophilic Diatoms Navicula glaciei and N. perminuta in Antarctic Coastal environment. I. Morphology and ecology. Algae 14(3):169–179

33

Kihara Y, Sahashi Y, Arita S, Ohtsuka T (2009) Diatoms of Yamakado moor in Shiga prefecture, Japan. Diatom, 25:91–105

34

Kim BS, Kim SY, Park JG, Witkowski A (2017) New records of the diatom species (Bacillariophyta) from the seaweed and tidal flats in Korea. Korean J Environ Biol 35(4):604–621

10.11626/KJEB.2017.35.4.604
35

Kim GB, Kang SM, Lee JB (2019) Spatial and temporal variation of phytoplankton community in the coastal waters of Jeju island. The Sea: J Korean Soc Oceanogr 24(1):92–105

36

Kim I, Kim G (2011) Large fluxes of rare earth elements through submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) from a volcanic island, Jeju, Korea. Mar Chem 127(1–4):12–19

10.1016/j.marchem.2011.07.006
37

Kim MC, Han YJ, Heo MS (2012) Microbiological Pollution Investigation of Lowland Spring Water at the Jeju City Waterfront, Jeju Island. J Life Sci 22(3):324–331

10.5352/JLS.2012.22.3.324
38

Kobayasi H, Idei M, Mayama S, Nagumo T, Osada K (2006) H.Kobayasi's atlas of Japanese diatoms based on electron microscopy. Uchida Rokakuho Publishing, Tokyo, 531 p

39

Krayesky DM, Castillo EMDC, Zamudio E, Norris JN, Fredericq S (2009) Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) of the Gulf of Mexico. In: Felder DL, Camp DK (eds) Gulf of Mexico: its origins, waters, and biota. 1. Biodiversity. Texas A&M University Press, Texas, pp 155–185

40

Kulaš A, Gligora Udovič M, Ector L, Van de Vijver B (2020) Analysis of the type material of Achnanthes hauckiana Grunow (Achnanthaceae, Bacillariophyceae). Bot Lett 167(4):439–452

10.1080/23818107.2020.1808527
41

Kwon HK, Kang H, Oh YH, Park SR, Kim G (2017) Green tide development associated with submarine groundwater discharge in a coastal harbor, Jeju, Korea. Sci Rep 7(1):1–9

10.1038/s41598-017-06711-028740250PMC5524685
42

Lecher AL, Mackey KR (2018) Synthesizing the effects of submarine groundwater discharge on marine biota. Hydrology 5(4):60. doi:10.3390/hydrology5040060

10.3390/hydrology5040060
43

Lee JB, Shynn B, Lee MH (2001) Seasonal dynamics of microalgal assemblage at tidepools in the southern intertidal zone of Cheju Island, Korea. Algae 16(2):197–197

44

Lee KS, Park WB, Hyun SG, Kim Y, Moon DC, Kim KY (2004) Hydrogeochemistry and isotope composition of springs in the southern and northern sides of Mt. Halla, Jeju Island. J Kor Geolo Soc 40:41–52

10.14770/jgsk.2004.40.1.41
45

Lee SD, Park JS, Lee JH (2012) New record of diatom species in Korean coastal waters. Korean J Environ Biol 30(3):245–271

46

Lee SD, Park JS, Lee JH (2013) Taxonomic study of the genus Achnanthes (Bacillariophyta) in Korean coastal waters. J Ecol Environ 36(4):391–406

10.5141/ecoenv.2013.391
47

Levkov Z (2009) Diatoms of Europe: diatoms of the European inland waters and comparable habitats. vol. 5. Amphora sensu lato. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag, Ruggel, 918 p

48

Levkov Z, Caput Mihalić K, Ector L (2010) A taxonomical study of Rhoicosphenia Grunow (Bacillariophyceae) with a key for identification of selected taxa. Fottea 10(2):145–200

10.5507/fot.2010.010
49

Liefer JD, MacIntyre HL, Novoveská L, Smith WL, Dorsey CP (2009) Temporal and spatial variability in Pseudo-nitzschia spp. in Alabama coastal waters: a “hot spot” linked to submarine groundwater discharge?. Harmful Algae 8(5):706–714

10.1016/j.hal.2009.02.003
50

Liu B, Williams DM, Blanco S, Jiang X (2017) Two new species of Luticola (Bacillariophyta) from the Wuling Mountains area, China. Nova Hedwig 146:197–208

10.1127/1438-9134/2017/197
51

Liu R (2008) Checklist of biota of Chinese seas. Academia Sinica Science Press, Beijing, 1267 p

52

Lobban CS, Schefter M, Jordan RW, Arai Y, Sasaki A, Theriot EC, Ashworth M, Ruck EC, Pennesi C (2012) Coral-reef diatoms (Bacillariophyta) from Guam: new records and preliminary checklist, with emphasis on epiphytic species from farmer-fish territories. Micronesica 43(2):237–479

53

Lobban CS, Tharngan BG (2025) Benthic Marine Diatom Flora (Bacillariophyta) of Yap, Micronesia: preliminary annotated list, with Some New mangrove species. Diversity 17(1):34. doi:10.3390/d17010034

10.3390/d17010034
54

Lobban CS, Witkowski A (2023) Marine benthic diatoms of Guam: new records, Dictyoneis apapae sp. nov., and updates to the checklist, Micronesica 2023(2):1–75

55

Lokhande V, Radhakrishnan C, Kociolek JP, Lowe R, Karthick B (2021) The diatom genus Luticola DG Mann (Bacillariophyceae) in the Western Ghats of India and its biogeography. Eur J Phycol 56(2):142–158

10.1080/09670262.2020.1783460
56

MABIK (2025) National list of marine species. National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea. https://www.mbris.kr/pub/marine/natilist/nationalist.do Accessed 19 Aug 2025

57

MacGillivary ML, Kaczmarska I (2015) Paralia (Bacillariophyta) stowaways in ship ballast: implications for biogeography and diversity of the genus. J Biol Res Thessalon 22:1–26

10.1186/s40709-015-0024-525984507PMC4389653
58

Martin-Jézéquel V, Hildebrand M, Brzezinski MA (2000) Silicon metabolism in diatoms: implications for growth. J Phycol 36:821–840

10.1046/j.1529-8817.2000.00019.x
59

Mayama S, Fujita D (1995) Two types of areola occlusion in the valve of Amphitetras antediluviana Ehrenberg. Diatom 11:25–29

60

Mejdandžić M, Bosak S, Orlić S, Gligora Udovič M, Peharec Štefanić P, Špoljarić I, Mršić G, Ljubešić Z (2017) Entomoneis tenera sp. nov., a new marine planktonic diatom (Entomoneidaceae, Bacillariophyta) from the Adriatic Sea. Phytotaxa 292(1):1–18

10.11646/phytotaxa.292.1.1
61

Moosdorf N, Oehler T (2017) Societal use of fresh submarine groundwater discharge: an overlooked water resource. Earth-Sci Rev 171:338–348

10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.006
62

Nair A, Mohan R, Shetye S, Gazi S, Jafar SA (2015) Trigonium curvatus sp. nov. and Trigonium arcticum (Bacillariophyceae) from the surface sediments of Prydz Bay, East Antarctica. Micropaleontology 61(3):185–192

10.47894/mpal.61.3.05
63

Nevrova E, Maltsev Y, Kezlya E, Mironov A, Kulikovskiy M (2024) Molecular phylogeny, morphology and distribution of Amphitetras antediluviana Ehrenberg from the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. Phytotaxa 672(1):49–63

10.11646/phytotaxa.672.1.3
64

NIBR (2025) National list of species of Korea. National Institute of Biological Resources. http://kbr.go.kr Accessed 19 Aug 2025

65

Noga T, Stanek-Tarkowska J, Kochman-Kędziora N, Rybak M, Peszek Ł, Poradowska A (2017) Luticola frequentissima Levkov, Metzeltin & Pavlov—morphological and ecological characteristics of a population from Southern Poland. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 46(2):237–243

10.1515/ohs-2017-0024
66

Osada K, Kobayasi H (1985) Fine structure of the brackish water pennate diatom Entomoneis alata (Ehr.) Ehr. var. japonica (Cl.) comb. nov. Jpn J Phycol 33(3):215–224

67

Park J, Khim JS, Ohtsuka T, Araki H, Witkowski A, Koh CH (2012) Diatom assemblages on Nanaura mudflat, Ariake Sea, Japan: with reference to the biogeography of marine benthic diatoms in Northeast Asia. Bot Stud 53:105–124

68

Park JS, Yun SM, Lee SD, Lee JB, Lee JH (2017) New records of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta) in the brackish and coastal waters of Korea. Korean J Environ Biol 35(3):215–226

10.11626/KJEB.2017.35.3.215
69

Park M, Lee SD, Lee H, Lee JY, Kwon D, Choi JM (2021) Identification of New Sub-Fossil Diatoms Flora in the Sediments of Suncheonman Bay, Korea. J Mar Sci Eng 9(6):591. doi:10.3390/jmse9060591

10.3390/jmse9060591
70

Pavlov A, Nakov T, Levkov Z, Furey P, Lowe R, Ector L (2009) Luticola grupcei (Bacillariophyceae)-a new freshwater diatom from Mountain Baba (Macedonia) and Great Smoky Mountains National Park (USA): comparison with the type material of L. goeppertiana (Bleisch) DG Mann. Nova Hedwig 89(1–2):147–164

10.1127/0029-5035/2009/0089-0147
71

Riaux-Gobin C, Romero O (2003) Marine Cocconeis Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyceae) species and related taxa from Kerguelen’s Land (Austral Ocean, Indian Sector). Bibl Diatomol 47:1–188

72

Round FE, Crawford RM, Mann DG (1990) Diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 747 p

73

Rybak M, Witkowski A, Peszek Ł, Kociolek JP, Risjani Y, Nguyen DH, Zhang J, Yunianta, Nguyen VD, Gastineau R, Duong TT, Rosa P, Meleder V (2021) Marine and brackish Luticola DG Mann (Bacillariophyta) species from the Java Sea and South China Sea coasts with the description of three new species. PhytoKeys 183:115–142

10.3897/phytokeys.183.7104934754265PMC8556211
74

Sar EA, Sala SE, Hinz F, Sunesen I (2003) Revision of Amphora holsatica (Bacillariophyceae). Eur J Phycol 38(1):73–81

10.1080/0967026031000096272
75

Sato S, Nagumo T, Tanaka J (2010) Morphological study of three marine araphid diatom species of Grammatophora Ehrenberg, with special reference to the septum structure. Diat Res 25(1):147–162

10.1080/0269249X.2010.9705835
76

Schmidt AWF (1925) Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. Series VIII, Heft 90, Tafeln 357–360. O.R. Reisland, Leipzig, 4 pls

77

Schmidt C, Morard R, Romero O, Kucera M (2018) Diverse internal symbiont community in the endosymbiotic for aminifera Pararotalia calcariformata: implications for symbiont shuffling under thermal stress. Front Microbiol 9:2018. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02018

10.3389/fmicb.2018.0201830254612PMC6141668
78

Serôdio J, Lavaud J (2022) Diatoms and their ecological importance. In: Leal Filho W, Azul AM, Brandli L, Lange Salvia A, Wall T (eds) Life Below Water. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 304–312

10.1007/978-3-319-98536-7_12
79

Shim JH (1994) Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna and flora of Korea, vol. 34 Marine phytoplankton. Ministry of Education, Korea, 487 p

80

Sims PA, Williams DM, Ashworth M (2018) Examination of type specimens for the genera Odontella and Zygoceros (Bacillariophyceae) with evidence for the new family Odontellaceae and a description of three new genera. Phytotaxa 382:1–56

10.11646/phytotaxa.382.1.1
81

Siqueiros Beltrones DA, Argumedo Hernández U, Landa Cansigno C (2016) Uncommon species diversity values in epiphytic diatom assemblages of the kelp Eisenia arborea. Hidrobiológica 26(1):61–76

10.24275/uam/izt/dcbs/hidro/2016v26n1/Siqueiros
82

Siver PA, Hamilton PB, Stachura-Suchoples K, Kociolek JP (2005) Freshwater diatom flora of North America: cape Cod, Massachussetts, USA. Iconographia Diatomologica 14. Gantner Verlag, Ruggell, Germany, 463 p

83

Snoeijs P, Balashova N (1998) Intercalibration and distribution of diatom species in the Baltic Sea vol 5 The Baltic Marine Biologists Publication No. 16e. Opulus Press, Uppsala, 144 p

84

Srivastava P, Verma J, Grover S, Sardar A (2016) On the importance of diatoms as ecological indicators in river ecosystems: a review. Indian J Plant Sci 5:70–86

85

Stachura-Suchoples K, Enke N, Schlie C, Schaub I, Karsten U, Jahn R (2016) Contribution towards a morphological and molecular taxonomic reference library of benthic marine diatoms from two Arctic fjords on Svalbard (Norway). Polar Biol 39(11):1933–1956

10.1007/s00300-015-1683-2
86

Stepanek JG, Kociolek JP (2018) Amphora and Halamphora from coastal and inland waters of the United States and Japan. J. Cramer/Gebrüder Borntraeger Science Publishers, 260 p

87

Taniguchi M, Burnett WC, Cable JE, Turner JV (2002) Investigation of submarine groundwater discharge. Hydrol Process 16(11):2115–2129

10.1002/hyp.1145
88

Taylor JC, Harding WR, Archibald CGM (2007) An illustrated guide to some common diatom species from South Africa. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, 225 p

89

Tiffany MA, Lange CB (2002) Diatoms provide attachment sites for other diatoms: a natural history of epiphytism from southern California. Phycologia 41(2):116–124

10.2216/i0031-8884-41-2-116.1
90

Tomas CR (1997) Identifying marine phytoplankton. Academic Press, San Diego, 858 p

91

Toyoda K, Nagumo T, Osada K, Tanaka J (2003) Morphological investigations of Achnanthes javanica Grunow and A. subconstricta (Meister) comb. nov. Diat Res 18(2):365–375

10.1080/0269249X.2003.9705598
92

Toyoda K, Williams DM (2004) Description of Achnanthes Bory (Bacillariophyceae) based on Kützing's type slides and materials I. New morphological information on Achnanthes brevipes var. intermedia (Kütz.) Cleve. Diatom 20:159–165

93

Trobajo R, Mann DG (2019) A rapid cleaning method for diatoms. Diat Res 34(2):115–124

10.1080/0269249X.2019.1637785
94

Trobajo R, Rovira L, Ector L, Wetzel CE, Kelly M, Mann DG (2013) Morphology and identity of some ecologically important small Nitzschia species. Diat Res 28(1):37–59

10.1080/0269249X.2012.734531
95

Tuji A (2016) Algae Aquae Dulcis Japonicae Exsiccatae. Fascile VII. Nos. 121-140. National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, 42 p

96

Van de Vijver B, Kopalová K, Zidarova R, Levkov Z (2014) Revision of the genus Halamphora (Bacillariophyta) in the Antarctic Region. Pl Ecol Evol 147(3):374–391

10.5091/plecevo.2014.979
97

Van de Vijver B, Ledeganck P, Lebouvier M (2002) Luticola beyensii sp. nov., a new aerophilous diatom from Ile Saint Paul (Indian Ocean, Taaf). Diat Res 17(1):235–241

10.1080/0269249X.2002.9705541
98

Wachnicka AH, Gaiser EE (2007) Characterization of Amphora and Seminavis from south Florida, USA. Diat Res 22(2):387–455

10.1080/0269249X.2007.9705722
99

Watanabe T (2005) Picture book and ecology of the freshwater diatoms. Uchida Rokakuho Publishing, Tokyo, 666 p

100

Watanabe T, Nagumo T, Sun Z, Hasegawa K, Miyagawa T, Kumada M, Tanaka J (2013) Morphology and taxonomy of Psammodiscus Round & Mann (Bacillariophyceae: Rhaphoneidales) with a description of the new species Psammodiscus calceatus. Phytotaxa 124(1):1–12

10.11646/phytotaxa.124.1.1
101

Witkowski A, Lange-Bertalot H, Metzeltin D (2000) Diatom flora of marine coasts I. Iconographia Diatomologica 7. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein, 925 p

102

Yılmaz E, Gastineau R, Górecka E, Solak CN, Trobajo R, Peszek Ł, Mann D (2025) Halamphora witkowskii sp. nov. (Catenulaceae, Bacillariophyta), a new diatom species from the alkaline waters of Lake Van, Republic of Türkiye. Nova Hedwig 120(1–4):299–312

10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2025/0980
103

Yun SM, Lee SD, Park JS, Lee JH (2016) A new approach for identification of the genus Paralia (Bacillariophyta) in Korea based on morphology and morphometric analyses. Algae 31(1):1–16

10.4490/algae.2016.31.3.7
104

Żelazna-Wieczorek J, Ziułkiewicz M (2009) Using benthic diatoms in the assessment of spring water quality in suburban areas. Oceanol Hydrobiol St 38(2):121–131

105

Zidarova R, Ivanov P, Hristova O, Dzurova B, Hineva E (2022) The unexpected diversity in Amphora sensu lato (Bacillariophyta) at Sozopol Bay, the western Black Sea. Phytotaxa 544(2):103–127

10.11646/phytotaxa.544.2.1
페이지 상단으로 이동하기