All Issue

2026 Vol.48

Article

14 January 2026. pp. 1-10
Abstract
References
1

Adcroft A, Anderson W, Balaji V, Blanton C, Bushuk M, Dufour CO, Dunne JP, Griffies SM, Hallberg R, Harrison MJ (2019) The GFDL global ocean and sea ice model OM4.0: model description and simulation features. J Adv Model Earth Syst 11:3167–3211. doi:10.1029/2019MS001726

10.1029/2019MS001726
2

Bakker DCE, Pfeil B, Landa CS, Metzl N, O'brien KM, Olsen A, Smith K, Cosca C, Harasawa S, Jones SD (2016) A multi-decade record of high-quality fCO2 data in version 3 of the surface ocean CO2 atlas (SOCAT). Earth Syst Sci Data 8:383–413. doi:10.5194/essd-8-383-2016

10.5194/essd-8-383-2016
3

Beech N, Rackow T, Semmler T, Jung T (2024) Exploring the ocean mesoscale at reduced computational cost with FESOM 2.5: efficient modeling strategies applied to the southern ocean. Geosci Model Dev 17:529–543. doi:10.5194/gmd-17-529-2024

10.5194/gmd-17-529-2024
4

Bleichrodt F, Bisseling RH, Dijkstra HA (2012) Accelerating a barotropic ocean model using a GPU. Ocean Modell 41:16–21. doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2011.10.001

10.1016/j.ocemod.2011.10.001
5

Chang I, Ho Kim Y, Park Y-G, Jin H, Pak G, Kwon J-I, Chang Y-S (2024) Assessment of high-resolution regional ocean reanalysis K-ORA22 for the northwest pacific. Prog Oceanogr 229:103359. doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2024.103359

10.1016/j.pocean.2024.103359
6

Ciżnicki M, Kierzynka M, Kopta P, Kurowski K, Gepner P (2012) Benchmarking data and compute intensive applications on modern CPU and GPU architectures. Procedia Comput Sci 9:1900–1909. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.04.208

10.1016/j.procs.2012.04.208
7

De Luca P, Galletti A, Giunta G, Marcellino L (2021) Recursive filter based GPU algorithms in a Data assimilation scenario. J Comput Sci 53:101339. doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101339

10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101339
8

Delmas V, Soulaïmani A (2022) Multi-GPU implementation of a time-explicit finite volume solver using CUDA and a CUDA-Aware version of OpenMPI with application to shallow water flows. Comput Phys Commun 271:108190. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108190

10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108190
9

Evensen G (1994) Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi‐geostrophic model using monte carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J Geophys Res-Oceans 99:10143–10162. doi:10.1029/94JC00572

10.1029/94JC00572
10

Evensen G (2003) The ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dynamics 53:343–367. doi:10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9

10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9
11

Fay AR, Gregor L, Landschützer P, Mckinley GA, Gruber N, Gehlen M, Iida Y, Laruelle GG, Rödenbeck C, Roobaert A (2021) SeaFlux: harmonization of air-sea CO2 fluxes from surface pCO2 data products using a standardized approach. Earth Syst Sci Data 13:4693–4710. doi:10.5194/essd-13-4693-2021

10.5194/essd-13-4693-2021
12

Häfner D, Nuterman R, Jochum M (2021) Fast, cheap, and turbulent-Global ocean modeling with GPU acceleration in python. J Adv Model Earth Syst 13:e2021MS002717. doi:10.1029/2021MS002717

10.1029/2021MS002717
13

Harris CR, Millman KJ, Van Der Walt SJ, Gommers R, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D, Wieser E, Taylor J, Berg S, Smith NJ (2020) Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585:357–362. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

10.1038/s41586-020-2649-232939066PMC7759461
14

Houtekamer PL, Mitchell HL (2001) A sequential ensemble Kalman Filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon Weather Rev 129:123–137. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0123:ASEKFF>2.0.CO;2

10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0123:ASEKFF>2.0.CO;2
15

Iida Y, Kojima A, Takatani Y, Nakano T, Sugimoto H, Midorikawa T, Ishii M (2015) Trends in pCO2 and sea–air CO2 flux over the global open oceans for the last two decades. J Oceanogr 71:637–661. doi:10.1007/s10872-015-0306-4

10.1007/s10872-015-0306-4
16

Jin H, Kim YH, Park Y-G, Chang I, Chang Y-S, Park H, Pak G (2024) Simulation characteristics of ocean predictability experiment for marine environment (OPEM): A western north pacific regional ocean prediction system. Ocean Sci J 59:71. doi:10.1007/s12601-024-00195-6

10.1007/s12601-024-00195-6
17

Jones SD, Le Quéré C, Rödenbeck C (2012) Autocorrelation characteristics of surface ocean pCO2and air-sea CO2 fluxes. Global Biogeochem Cy 26:GB2042. doi:10.1029/2010GB004017

10.1029/2010GB004017
18

Keckler SW, Dally WJ, Khailany B, Garland M, Glasco D (2011) GPUs and the future of parallel computing. IEEE micro 31:7–17. doi:10.1109/MM.2011.89

10.1109/MM.2011.89
19

Landschützer P, Laruelle GG, Roobaert A, Regnier P (2020) A uniform pCO2 climatology combining open and coastal oceans. Earth Syst Sci Data 12:2537–2553. doi:10.5194/essd-12-2537-2020

10.5194/essd-12-2537-2020
20

Martin MJ, Hoteit I, Bertino L, Moore AM (2025) Data assimilation schemes for ocean forecasting: state of the art. State of the Planet 5:9. doi:10.5194/sp-2024-20

10.5194/sp-2024-20
21

Navarro CA, Hitschfeld-Kahler N, Mateu L (2014) A survey on parallel computing and its applications in Data-Parallel problems using GPU architectures. Commun Comput Phys 15:285–329. doi:10.4208/cicp.110113.010813a

10.4208/cicp.110113.010813a
22

Patterson DA, Hennessy JL (2016). Computer organization and design ARM edition: the hardware software interface. Morgan kaufmann.

23

Porter AR, Heimbach P (2025) Unlocking the power of parallel computing: GPU technologies for ocean forecasting. State of the Planet 5-opsr:23. doi:10.5194/sp-2024-32

10.5194/sp-2024-32
24

Rödenbeck C, Bakker DCE, Gruber N, Iida Y, Jacobson AR, Jones S, Landschützer P, Metzl N, Nakaoka S, Olsen A (2015) Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability-first results of the surface ocean pCO2 mapping intercomparison (SOCOM). Biogeosciences 12:7251–7278. doi:10.5194/bg-12-7251-2015

10.5194/bg-12-7251-2015
25

Roobaert A, Regnier P, Landschützer P, Laruelle GG (2024) A novel sea surface pCO2-product for the global coastal ocean resolving trends over 1982–2020. Earth Syst Sci Data 16:421–441. doi:10.5194/essd-16-421-2024

10.5194/essd-16-421-2024
26

Shchepetkin AF, Mcwilliams JC (2005) The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Modell 9:347–404. doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.002

10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.002
27

Silvestri S, Wagner GL, Constantinou NC, Hill CN, Campin J-M, Souza AN, Bishnu S, Churavy V, Marshall J, Ferrari R (2025) A GPU-Based ocean dynamical core for routine mesoscale-resolving climate simulations. J Adv Model Earth Syst 17:e2024MS004465. doi:10.1029/2024MS004465

10.1029/2024MS004465
28

Vance TC, Wengren M, Burger E, Hernandez D, Kearns T, Medina-Lopez E, Merati N, O’brien K, O’neil J, Potemra JT (2019) From the oceans to the cloud: opportunities and challenges for data, models, computation and workflows. Front Mar Sci 6:211. doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00211

10.3389/fmars.2019.00211
29

Vanderbauwhede W, Davidson G (2018) Domain-specific acceleration and auto-parallelization of legacy scientific code in FORTRAN 77 using source-to-source compilation. Comput Fluids 173:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.06.005

10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.06.005
30

Xu S, Huang X, Oey LY, Xu F, Fu H, Zhang Y, Yang G (2015) POM.gpu-v1.0: a GPU-based princeton ocean model. Geosci Model Dev 8:2815–2827. doi:10.5194/gmd-8-2815-2015

10.5194/gmd-8-2815-2015
31

Yuan Y, Yu F, Chen Z, Li X, Hou F, Gao Y, Gao Z, Pang R (2024) Towards a real-time modeling of global ocean waves by the fully GPU-accelerated spectral wave model WAM6-GPU v1.0. Geosci Model Dev 17:6123–6136. doi:10.5194/gmd-17-6123-2024

10.5194/gmd-17-6123-2024
32

Zhang H, Zhang D-F, Bi X-A (2012) Comparison and analysis of GPGPU and parallel computing on multi-core CPU. Int J Inf Educ Technol 2:185–187. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2012.V2.106

10.7763/IJIET.2012.V2.106
33

Zhao X-D, Liang S-X, Sun Z-C, Zhao X-Z, Sun J-W, Liu Z-B (2017) A GPU accelerated finite volume coastal ocean model. J Hydrodyn 29:679–690. doi:10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60780-1

10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60780-1
Information
  • Publisher :Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국해양과학기술원
  • Journal Title :Ocean and Polar Research
  • Journal Title(Ko) :Ocean and Polar Research
  • Volume : 48
  • Pages :1-10
  • Received Date : 2025-09-25
  • Revised Date : 2025-12-22
  • Accepted Date : 2025-12-29
  • Published Date : 2026-01-14