An Analysis of the Effects in the TAC System by analyzing Catch of TAC Target Species

Seonghyun Sim; Jungsam Lee; Seoyeon Oh

doi:10.4217/OPR.2020.42.2.157

All Issue

2020 Vol.42, Issue 2 Preview Page Next Page

Article

An Analysis of the Effects in the TAC System by analyzing Catch of TAC Target Species TAC 어종의 어획량 분석을 통한 TAC 제도의 효과 분석

30 June 2020. pp. 157-169

PDF XML

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effect of total allowable catches (TACs) on the target species. First to effects analyse of TACs, the 8 TAC target species and 75 non-target species were selected for which catch data were available before and after the introduction of the TACs. The 8 target species were simply compared to catch changes before and after TACs. Through the comparison, it was confirmed how the catches of target fishes have changed after the implementation of the TACs. Secondly, the Difference In Differences(DID) analysis was conducted to confirm the effects of the TACs on the catches of the target fishes using the catch data of 8 TAC target species and 75 non-TAC species. Finally, to overcome the limitations of the DID analysis, the random effects model was estimated to confirm the effects of the TACs on the catch of the TAC target species. Overall, this study confirmed that the TACs affects catches of target species, not only through simple comparisons of catches before and after the introduction of the TACs but also through econometric analysis.

Keywords

TACs

catch changes

target species

DID analysis

random effects model

References

국가법령정보센터 (2020) 수산자원관리법. http://www.law. go.kr/ Accessed 28 Feb 2020
National Law Information Center (2020) Fishery resources management Act. http://www.law.go.kr/ Accessed 28 Feb 2020

김도훈 (2003) 총허용어획량 (TAC) 어업제도에 있어 할당 어획량 설정 방식별 경제적 효과분석. 농업경제연구 44(4):165-182
Kim DH (2003) An economic analysis of the quota allocation strategies in the total allowable catch fisheries policy. Kor J Agricult Econ 44(4):165–182

김봉태 (2017) 도서지역 어촌의 조건불리성 분석: 농림어업총조사 자료를 이용하여. 수산경영론집 48(4):11-25
Kim BT (2017) An analysis on the less favored condition of fishing village in Korean island regions using census of agriculture, forestry and fisheries. J Fish Bus Admin 48(4):11–25

김봉태, 이성우 (2011) 어촌종합개발사업의 정량적 효과 분석. 해양정책연구 26(2):75-104
Kim BT, Lee SW (2011) Quantitative analysis of the effect of fishing village development project. Ocean Policy Res 26(2):75–104

10.35372/kmiopr.2011.26.2.004

류정곤, John MG, 남종오 (2004) 우리나라 ITQ제도 시행을 위한 기반조성 연구. 한국해양수산개발원, 서울, 106 p
Ryu JG, John MG, Nam JO (2004) A study on the establishment of the foundation for the implementation of ITQ system in Korea. Korea Maritime Institute, Seoul, 106 p

류정곤, 김대영, 이정삼, 김수진 (2005) 우리나라 TAC 제도의 평가시스템 구축에 관한 연구. 한국해양수산개발원, 서울, 116 p
Ryu JG, Kim DY, Lee JS, Kim SJ (2005) A study on the establishment of evaluation system of TAC system in Korea. Korea Maritime Institute, Seoul, 116 p

민인식, 최필선 (2013) STATA 패널데이터 분석. ㈜지필미디어, 서울, 262 p
Min IS, Choi PS (2013) Panael data analysis. Jiphilmedia, Seoul, 262 p

서효정, 박철형 (2016) DEA를 이용한 붉은대게 어업의 TAC 효과 분석. 인문사회과학연구 17(3):433-462
Seo HJ, Park CH (2016) A study on the effects of TAC system in red crab fishery using DEA. Ins Human Soc Sci 17(3):433–462

10.15818/ihss.2016.17.3.433

우석진 (2018) 정책분석을 위한 STATA. (주)지필미디어, 서울, 272 p
Woo SJ (2018) STATA for policy analysis. Jiphilmedia, Seoul, 272 p

정민주, 남종오 (2016) 키조개 TAC 제도의 효과 분석. 수산경영론집 47(3):15-33
Jeong MJ, Nam JO (2016) Effectiveness analysis on comb pen shell based on TAC system. J Fish Bus Admin 47(3):15–33

10.12939/FBA.2016.47.3.015

통계청 (2020) 어업생산동향조사. http://kosis.kr/ Accessed 28 Feb 2020
Korean Statistical Information Service (2020) Fishery production survey. http://kosis.kr/ Accessed 28 Feb 2020

한국성인교육학회 (1998) 교육평가용어사전. (주)학지사, 서울, 306 p
Adult and Continuing Education of Korea (1998) Dictionary of educational evaluation terminology. Hakjisa, Seoul, 306 p

한국수산자원공단 (2020) TAC 소개. https://www.fira.or.kr/fira/main.jsp Accessed 28 Feb 2020
Korea Fisheries Resources Agency (2020) Introduction of TAC system. https://www.fira.or.kr/fira/main.jsp Accessed 28 Feb 2020

Arellano M (2003) Panel data econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 231 p

10.1093/0199245282.001.0001

Ashenfelter O, Card D (1984) Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs. National Bureau of Economic Research No. w1489

10.3386/w1489

Baltagi BH (2005) Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 390 p

Card D, Krueger AB (1994) Minimum wages and employment: A Case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Am Econ Rev 84(4):772-793

10.3386/w4509

Cunningham S, Bennear LS, Smith MD (2016) Spillovers in regional fisheries management: Do catch shares cause leakage? Land Econ 92(2):344-362

10.3368/le.92.2.344

Eissa N, Liebman JB (1996) Labor supply response to the earned income tax credit. Q J Econ 111(2):605-637

10.2307/2946689

Hausman JA (1978) Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251-1271

10.2307/1913827

Scheld AM, Anderson CM, Uchida H (2012) The economic effects of catch share management: The Rhode Island fluke sector pilot program. Mar Resour Econ 27(3):203-228

10.5950/0738-1360-27.3.203

Smith MD, Zhang J, Coleman FC (2006) Effectiveness of marine reserves for large-scale fisheries management. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63(1):153-164

10.1139/f05-205

Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. MIT Press, Massachusetts, 752 p

Information

Publisher :Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology
Publisher(Ko) :한국해양과학기술원
Journal Title :Ocean and Polar Research
Journal Title(Ko) :Ocean and Polar Research
Volume : 42
No :2
Pages :157-169
Received Date : 2020-04-02
Revised Date : 2020-06-01
Accepted Date : 2020-06-08
DOI :https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2020.42.2.157

Ocean and Polar Research ISSN:2234-7313(Online) Ocean and Polar Research

All Issue